December 12, 2004

Tonight the Moon

Is a fat, gold watch
Born of mechanical irritation—
Long traffic lights,
A shirtless fool dashes
Before dark fast cars—

Tick across the turning sky
To signal. . . what?
The honeyed end of a bad day?

More likely, nothing. Wound
In the purple-stained sky,
Golden gibberish homelessness,
Implacable, unpluckable.

No, love did
Not set you going,
But ancient violence,
A cosmic pummeling
Amid silent stars
(No harmonies here).

O pock-marked and tethered stone
You are luminous as cement!

Nothing more

Yet,
You drip from the horizon like wax
And congeal overhead,
A yellow splotch urging patience.

Posted by mallarme at December 12, 2004 11:04 PM
Comments

I don't like the word "fool." Not just your usage here, but in general. It's just so fey and high-romantic.

Posted by: sleepnotwork at December 13, 2004 02:47 AM

I disagree. Fool can still be used today. I'm surprised that you would object to "fool" and not to "O" though.

Posted by: mallarme at December 13, 2004 10:15 AM

well, it seems like fey and high romantic is what you're going for, which is why I objected to fool in general rather than specifically in this context.

Posted by: sleepnotwork at December 13, 2004 11:39 AM

Well, mock-Romantic, yes. :) It's pretty much impossible to use "O" in modern poetry without meaning it ironically. I still disagree about "fool" in general. Hayden Carruth uses it quite well and has an eminently contemporary voice. For an example, see this poem:

http://www.cs.rice.edu/~ssiyer/minstrels/poems/774.html

I don't think it's one of his best, but it's certainly characteristic.

That said, I'm guessing my disagreement stems more from the fact that I use the word in everyday conversation, so don't feel like it's outdated.

Posted by: mallarme at December 13, 2004 11:59 AM
Site Meter